The Supreme Court asked the petitioners challenging the changes made to Article 370 to provide evidence to support their claim that the provision was intended to be temporary. The court questioned whether there was any specific document or statement from the framers of the Constitution or the Constituent Assembly that indicated this. The petitioners were asked to present any relevant material to substantiate their contention.
Hearing challenging to Art 370 started, SC has queries on its nature of provision
Athiya Shetty's Mom filled with tears
Suranya Aiyar played the lawyer fighting for Sagarika Chakraborty's case
Gotten threats of death in the past, claims Bajrang Punia
Isha Ambani reached Jaisalmer with her husband o attend Kiara Advani and Sidharth Malhotra's wedding
Radhika Merchant decked up in the most-pretty lehenga
What are Unity Malls mentioned by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman
Nysa Devgn charmed in no makeup look
Dharmendra and his first wife Prakash Kaur enjoyed with Sunny Deol
Add DM to Home Screen